Either SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) or Visual Studio can be used for database development. I put them side by side into a single composite screen capture where you literally see the gaps between the products. SQL Server 2012 was installed with all features selected and default settings. The only modifications to the SQL Server installation were the additions of the AdventureWorks2012 and AdventureWorks2012DW databases.
Using Visual Studio instead of SSMS for database application development gives you the advantage of integration with Team Foundation Server for source code control. Additionally, localdb gives you a way to debug stored procedures locally in case your DBA won’t grant you sufficient rights to debug on the database server. You can copy your production schema to your localdb and debug from within Visual Studio.
Figure 1. SQL Server 2012 Management Studio on the left, Visual Studio 2013 on the right. Screen captures made on Windows 8.1.
If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here
Subscribe to this post's comments using
About John Paul Cook
John Paul Cook is a Data Platform Solution Architect working out of Microsoft's Houston office. Prior to joining Microsoft, he was a SQL Server MVP. He is experienced in SQL Server and Oracle database application design, development, and implementation. He has spoken at many conferences including Microsoft TechEd and the SQL PASS Summit. He has worked in oil and gas, financial, manufacturing, and healthcare industries. John is also a Registered Nurse who graduated from Vanderbilt University with a Master of Science in Nursing Informatics and is an active member of the Sigma Theta Tau nursing honor society. He volunteers as a nurse at clinics that treat low income patients. Contributing author to SQL Server MVP Deep Dives
and SQL Server MVP Deep Dives Volume 2
. Opinions expressed in John's blog are strictly his own and do not represent Microsoft in any way.